
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat performance wearing this hideous red dress. Same goes for Diane Kruger. Whoever did the convincing that these classic beauties wear them outside the house and, god forbid, during a red carpet event needs to be fired or at least needs to get with the program *anything that looks like you had to kill something to make it, is not fashion couture*.
I must say that Kelly Rowland, Eva Langoria and Nicole Ritchie look quite chic and sexy. They’ve got it right – it’s the basic concept of accessorizing vs looking like something the neighborhood cat dragged in.
Celebrity Photo courtesy of Life & Style Magazine
Sponsored Links
Did You Subscribe Yet?
Subscribe by email or by RSS feed
with friends by email
on facebook, stumpleupon, myspace and digg
Bookmark The Diva Network on IE or Firefox
Make The Diva Network your default homepage







Thanks for dropping by!
Do You Love It Or Do You Hate It?…
Just once, our favourite celebrities are allowed to have a fashion faux pax. And this is it ….Feather dresses.
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat…
Do You Love It Or Do You Hate It?…
Just once, our favourite celebrities are allowed to have a fashion faux pax. And this is it ….Feather dresses.
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat p…
I am not a fan of all the feathers either. Not sure who told them it looks good but I personally don’t think it does in the least.
I think feathers are great on hats and some earrings, but not on dresses . They remind me of the items drag queens wear in the caricatures of biological womanhood.
Yeah…not sure about the feathers. It’s almost like overkill to see that many feathers on a dress! I’d rather feather stayed where they belonged: on birds.
I have to say these embellishments are somewhat tacky, even when used selectively. Definitely a bit over the top and not conducive to those of us who build a wardrobe around “staples”, items we’ll get some mileage from at least on a few occasions/seasons!
It’s for the birds. I’m sorry. Couldn’t resist the bad pun.
Are the feathers flame retardant? I can see a flaming dessert becoming a disaster with one trip and a hemline that is too close to the action!
LOL…. So, the question is, how many birds did it take to make Sienna’s dress?
Hate it a LOT! Feathers are for birds. On people they just look silly.
Accer, I totally agree with you on that one. Especially when it looks like you had to chase a hundred chickens just to make the dress.
Could you imagine what might happen if they got caught in a rain storm without an umbrella or rain coat? Does wet bird smell like wet dog?
LOL, that could get really nasty
I do not care for the feather dresses at all. The one accessory that I have never had a taste for was feathers!
Jewel, LOL! Of course, I have accessories that have feathers on them, just not on the stuff that I go out in public with….
I think maybe feathers look best on birds. It is good to know that even celebrities get it wrong sometimes, it shows they are only human.
Leave a Reply