Subscribe 
Print This Post
Home
Just once, our favourite celebrities are allowed to have a fashion faux pax. And this is it ….Feather dresses.
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat performance wearing this hideous red dress. Same goes for Diane Kruger. Whoever did the convincing that these classic beauties wear them outside the house and, god forbid, during a red carpet event needs to be fired or at least needs to get with the program *anything that looks like you had to kill something to make it, is not fashion couture*.
I must say that Kelly Rowland, Eva Langoria and Nicole Ritchie look quite chic and sexy. They’ve got it right - it’s the basic concept of accessorizing vs looking like something the neighborhood cat dragged in.
Celebrity Photo courtesy of Life & Style Magazine
Related Topics
Did You Subscribe Yet?
Link to this article
Related Posts
- Jessica Simpson Fashion - Shoes, Bags and Sunglasses (3)
- Hair Sedu Short Style (5)
- Celebrity in the News - Angelina Jolie, Jenny Garth and Jennifer Hudson (4)
- Brown Shoe Forms Footwear Partnership With Music, Entertainment Superstar Fergie (6)
- Up to 75% Off Designer Bikinis, Jeans, T-Shirts & Dresses at LabelSpree.com (5)
Thanks for dropping by!
Do You Love It Or Do You Hate It?…
Just once, our favourite celebrities are allowed to have a fashion faux pax. And this is it ….Feather dresses.
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat…
Do You Love It Or Do You Hate It?…
Just once, our favourite celebrities are allowed to have a fashion faux pax. And this is it ….Feather dresses.
Even fashion darling, Sienna Miller *I did mention once even a rag would look fantastic hanging on her* is not allowed to have a repeat p…
I am not a fan of all the feathers either. Not sure who told them it looks good but I personally don’t think it does in the least.
I think feathers are great on hats and some earrings, but not on dresses . They remind me of the items drag queens wear in the caricatures of biological womanhood.
Yeah…not sure about the feathers. It’s almost like overkill to see that many feathers on a dress! I’d rather feather stayed where they belonged: on birds.
I have to say these embellishments are somewhat tacky, even when used selectively. Definitely a bit over the top and not conducive to those of us who build a wardrobe around “staples”, items we’ll get some mileage from at least on a few occasions/seasons!
It’s for the birds. I’m sorry. Couldn’t resist the bad pun.
Are the feathers flame retardant? I can see a flaming dessert becoming a disaster with one trip and a hemline that is too close to the action!
LOL…. So, the question is, how many birds did it take to make Sienna’s dress?
Hate it a LOT! Feathers are for birds. On people they just look silly.
Accer, I totally agree with you on that one. Especially when it looks like you had to chase a hundred chickens just to make the dress.
Could you imagine what might happen if they got caught in a rain storm without an umbrella or rain coat? Does wet bird smell like wet dog?
LOL, that could get really nasty
I do not care for the feather dresses at all. The one accessory that I have never had a taste for was feathers!
Jewel, LOL! Of course, I have accessories that have feathers on them, just not on the stuff that I go out in public with….
Leave a Reply